Catholicism
and the Early Schisms
After
the First Council of Nicea there were another councils convened in
order to condemn several new heresies. Nevertheless,
these heresies were short-lived and not very
influential,
and they slightly differed from the Orthodoxy. In 380
AD,
however, a completely new chapter in the history of Christianity began.
The Christian Church was established as a state religion of the Roman
Empire, and it was the
second state church in (the)
history (the first was Armenian Church). Afterwards, Christianity
became a political issue and, as a result, some
problems usually attached to politics arose. A
phenomenon of schisms came into existence, a
the
phenomenon that finally led to the birth of Anglicanism. A schism is
an
institutional division between two
or more
churches not caused by the
differencies in their faiths,
but
usually resulting from political
and other non-religious reasons such as
geographic isolation.
In
the 4th
and
5th
century,
the Roman Empire
was not the only state where Christianity existed. When it eventually
became the
state religion of the Empire, Christians began to be regarded as the
agents of Rome within the
states that had rocky relations with the Empire.
I mean here
the Sassanid Empire in today's Iran. In 424,
local bishops recognised their leader as the
patriarch and cut ties with the Roman Church. The Persian Church became
later
the Church of the East which exists
to the present and is one of the main branches of Christianity.
During the Middle Ages it formed the
second great Christian world beside Christianity in Europe, but it was
almost unkown to the Western World.
It was present from Persia as far as
India and China,
but later it
declined. Until the twentieth
century,
it was widespread among hereditary
patriarchs (the
post passed from
uncle to nephew due to celibacy).
Another
schism took
place
in the
20th
century,
however,
concerning
this and other issues.
The
Church of the East is now
divided into the Assyrian Church of the East and the Ancient Church
of the East. Contrary to a
popular belief,
the doctrine
of the Church of the East is not based on Nestorian teachings
condemned in
the Council of Ephesus. They claim that
Nestorianism is a heresy and consider calling them „Nestorians” offensive.
However,
the existence of a formal schism between the Roman Church, its
successor churches and the Church of the East
seems doubtful when
we recall a
story that happened seven centuries later. A Mongolian monk from the
Church of the East arrived on a
diplomatic mission to Rome and received the Holy Communion from the
hands of the Roman Pope!
It is impossible for
a person regarded
as schismatic
to receive the Holy
Communion
in the Roman Catholic Church. This story has led
me to the conclusion that the statement of Persian patriarchs that
they were
not in the communion with the Roman Church was a lie whose purpose was to
avoid persecutions. Real schism took place many years later,
mostly due to geographical isolation.
At
the very beginning of Christianity as a state religion of the Roman
Empire,
there were five major episcopal sees: one in Rome, one in
Constantinople, one in Alexandria, one in Antioch and the last one in
Jerusalem. The bishops of these sees were
called patriarchs. Rome, Alexandria and Antioch were already
prominent from the time of early Christianity, while Constantinople
came to the fore upon becoming the imperial residence in the 4th
century. Thereafter,
it was ranked consistently just after Rome. Jerusalem received a
ceremonial place due to the city's importance in the early days of
Christianity. The first four of them were also strong political
centers in the Empire; only Jerusalem did not form a separate
political entity.
The cities were also driven by a desire to
dominate each other and it finally led to other
schisms.
Brak komentarzy:
Prześlij komentarz